Quality Mall Product: Outcomes and Costs of Community Living: Semi-Independent Living and...
Quality Mall Home Page

Product Links

Email this Product E-mail this product

Printable Copy Printable Copy

Sign up for Product Alerts Sign up for new product alerts

Located in This product is located in:

  >>Store(s):
  Systems Change Shop

  >>Department(s):
  Cost Effectiveness
Search
Advanced Search
Know something that belongs in the Mall? Nominate it
Product Information Outcomes and Costs of Community Living: Semi-Independent Living and Group Homes

Highlights   Full Description   How to Obtain/Whom to Call   Web Links  
 Full Description: 
Consumer outcomes and recurrent (non-capital) service costs were compared for matched groups of Australian adults with intellectual disability and moderate to low support needs living in group homes or semi-independently (i.e., with drop-in staff support). Participants from these two setting types were individually matched on adaptive and challenging behavior, so that any differences in outcomes could reasonably be said to be due to living and support arrangements not systematic differences between participants.

Outcomes examined included quality of life, safety, aloneness, social dissatisfaction, personal care, domestic management, health care, money management, social network, use of mainstream community services, community participation, domestic participation, stability of place of residence, living companion turnover, and natural support.

Most outcomes did not differ significantly when group home and semi-independent participants were compared. Where significant differences were found, participants living semi-independently experienced better outcomes: significantly less social dissatisfaction, more frequent and independent use of community facilities, more participation in domestic tasks, and greater empowerment. There were no outcomes with significantly better results for group home participants.

Outcomes that might have been expected to present more problems to individuals living semi-independently, such as safety, loneliness, personal care, domestic management, health care and money management, showed similar results for both group home and semi-independent participants. The lower level of staffing provided to semi-independent participants was not associated with poorer outcomes.

Per-person expenditure was substantially higher for group home participants. The major factor in this cost differential was the lower number of staff support hours provided to the semi-independent group. The entire report is available on the internet.

A published version of this paper may be found at:
Stancliffe, R. J., & Keane, S. (2000). Outcomes and costs of community living: A matched comparison of group homes and semi-independent living. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 25, 281-305.
Is the information for this product outdated or incorrect? Please notify us
 
 
 

This web site is maintained by the Research and Training Center on Community Living with support from the National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services, the Human Services Research Institute and the Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. E-mail weste050@umn.edu.
©2008 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.

Online Privacy Policy